Pacific AI Room — sanity check

Lane: pacific-ai-room Written 2026-09-09 ~11:05 AM PDT by A2 (Fable 5.1, Nano). Why this exists: you asked whether the latest Pacific files exist, whether they were updated, what is highest value to give and to implement, and whether we acted on any of it. Read-check across Nano, M2 and Mini; nothing sent, nothing deployed.

Files: Latest and identical on all three boxes as of the 09-07 refinement pass (52 files; every hash matched Nano ↔ M2, five key files matched Mini). Edits made today (roster section, Shayne mark-off, gift PDFs, the AIOS-MAP → SYSTEM-MAP rename and the rebuilt SHARE-2026-09-09.zip) were pushed Nano → M2 and Nano → Mini with md5 checks after each push.

Sent to the group: Nothing from the fleet. No DM, no group post, no hosted link. Shayne link: sent by Sean (confirmed 09-09). Everything else is staged behind two of your decisions (map wording, hosting) and three send GOs.

Implemented internally: 4 of the top 5 “value to implement” cards were started on 09-07 (prompt-only unattended guard applied, permission tiers v0 written, evals ledger seeded, routing file copied). Each still needs one ruling from you to finish.

Fleet misses: Two, one now fixed. The roster was never updated after the 09-06 call — fixed 09-09 (dated section added, analysis columns labelled as such, board N27 unblocked). Still open: an older duplicate “PacificAI” starter kit from 08-23 is still sitting next to the new one with its A0 card open.

1. What was made, and whether it was updated

FileMadeUpdatedShare?State
2026-09-04-pacific-ai-room/SHARE-2026-09-09.zip (15 files; replaces the 09-07 zip, which is in the trash vault)09-0709-09 — rebuilt after renaming AIOS-MAP → SYSTEM-MAP (Codex caught the internal project name in a shareable filename)ShareableReady to drop; leak scan clean
…/SYSTEM-MAP.html + .pdf (your one-page principle map; renamed from AIOS-MAP 09-09)09-0409-07 (claims re-checked vs autonomy baseline; “in progress” marks added)ShareableWording not yet approved by you
…/KIT/index.html (10-question kit → plan → “copy my profile”)09-0409-07 (Q10 “already tried”, per-answer “why for you”; Playwright pass iPhone + desktop)ShareableReady; hosting undecided
…/PACK/ six one-pagers (.md + .pdf): verified-truth rules, memory + learning journal, rulings file, output packet standard, model tiering, unattended sessions09-0409-07 (plain-language pass, grade ≤5.3; “try this today” boxes)ShareableReady
…/START-HERE.md (cover note inside the zip)09-07ShareableReady
…/ROSTER.md (who is client / partner / peer)09-0409-09 — dated 09-06 section addedInternalKarl, Vladimír, Ahmad, Guy, Stuart added; Rodric’s presentation and David’s October CRM date folded in
…/GROUP-VALUE.md (five group gifts, three personal gifts, do-not-share list)09-04InternalCurrent
2026-09-07-pacific-ai-assessment/VALUE-SHARE.md (who gets what; cover note; Shayne text; send order)09-07InternalCurrent — Shayne link sent 09-09 (marked in file)
…/VALUE-EXTRACT.md (18 adoption cards, top 5 ranked)09-07InternalCurrent
…/NEXT-CALL-PLAN.md (your 5-minute segment, 3 questions for Rodric, send sequence)09-07InternalCurrent — assumes third call ~09-20
…/gifts/david-crm-call-intake.md, connor-truth-and-reports.md, drago-programmatic-skills.md09-07Shareable (one recipient each)Ready; leak scan 0 leaks
vault/research/pacific-ai-room/2026-08-23-call-extract.md, 2026-09-06-call-extract.md09-04, 09-07InternalBoth calls captured
comms/outputs/starter-kits/pacificai/ (older “PacificAI” prompt kit for kits.seanvargas.com)08-23neverStaged, no design passDuplicate of the 09-04 KIT; A0 card from 08-23 still open

Every 09-07 change has a .bak-20260907 sibling, so the 09-04 versions are recoverable.

2. Highest value to GIVE (ranked) — and what a yes does

  1. David (host) — gifts/david-crm-call-intake.md by DM. His CRM starts in October with a 5,000-customer outreach goal; the gift is the intake pattern his builder needs. A yes = you send one file and one question (“which system holds the customer record — API or spreadsheet?”). Highest value because he is the host, the top client fit, and time-boxed.
  2. Shayne — the one-time-payment CRM link by text. DONE (Sean sent it; confirmed 2026-09-09). Was the overdue call-1 debt; partner posture kept.
  3. Group — cover note + SHARE-2026-09-09.zip. A yes = one group message with the zip (no deploy) or a hosted link (needs a deploy GO + slug). Send 2–3 days before the third call so people open it beforehand.
  4. Connor — gifts/connor-truth-and-reports.md by DM. Answers his “it lies to me constantly” and the over-built Make scenario. He was not on call 2; DM, do not wait.
  5. Drago — gifts/drago-programmatic-skills.md by DM. The “make the shipping skill code, let the model read exceptions” recipe. He builds it himself; the gift is the design.

Rodric, Gonzalo, Vladimír, Karl and the rest get only the group send; Rodric gets three questions on the call, not files.

3. Highest value to IMPLEMENT (top 5 from VALUE-EXTRACT) — and whether we acted

#CardActed on?What is left
1Unattended block as the executor’s prompt prelude (Rodric’s never → ask → draft → act idea applied to our own executor)Prompt-only guard applied 09-07 on M2, Nano, Mini (backups bak-20260907; AIOS_UNATTENDED=0 disables). It is text the executor prepends, not machine enforcement. Verified today: the executor is cycling with the guarded script.You confirm the default stays on (board N29). No guarded dispatch has fired yet, so it is untested in anger.
2Model tier per plan step + FLEET-ROUTING.md onto M2Routing file copied Nano → M2 09-07. Tier paragraph for the contract standard is staged.GO the one-line tier paragraph (N29).
3PERMISSION-TIERS.md (never / ask / draft / act × ~32 task types)v0 written at ops/reference/PERMISSION-TIERS.md 09-07.Your ruling on the rows (N29). Until then cards do not cite a tier, so the Sean-only queue does not shrink.
4repeats: counter on memory files + evals ledger rowLedger seeded (comms/ai/EVALS-LEDGER.md, 7 rows) + memory-repeats.py written; no memory file counted yet.GO to seed the first 3 repeat counts.
5Activate the daily Medicare blog (B9) and add a Google Business Profile post stepStaged only. Pipeline + LaunchAgent exist; GBP step not written.Your GO (B9 was ruled 09-04 but the LaunchAgent is not loaded) + claude login on Nano (board M19). Only card with a revenue lane behind it.

Free extra the extract recommends regardless: the 15-minute “prefer non-commercial sources” rule in storm-research (card 10). I found no evidence it was added; unverified either way.

4. What the fleet had not done (no GO needed — status after today)

5. Your decisions — reply by number

  1. Map wording. Read SYSTEM-MAP.pdf once. GO as-is, or name the callout to change (rulings-file line, “cards die at a time limit” line, “what stays human” list).
  2. Hosting. A = zip by chat (no deploy, ready now). B = preview-host slug (deploy GO + slug). C = artifact page (private link).
  3. The three DMs. GO on David, Connor, Drago as written in gifts/, or edits.
  4. Shayne. DONE — Sean confirmed 2026-09-09 he already sent the link. No action.
  5. Group post timing. Third call assumed ~09-20; post ~09-17/18. Confirm the call date or say when.
  6. PERMISSION-TIERS v0. Rule the rows, or say “default on, fix rows as they bite”.
  7. B9 daily blog. GO to load the LaunchAgent (needs your claude login on Nano first).
  8. Old 08-23 PacificAI kit. Retire as superseded, or keep for kits.seanvargas.com.

6. Evidence

Hashes: md5 -q per file on Nano and M2 (all equal); Mini ~/aios spot-check on the zip, map PDF, VALUE-SHARE, VALUE-EXTRACT, 09-06 extract (all equal). Acted-on state from comms/ai/TASK-LOG.md rows 09-04/09-07, comms/ai/TASKS.md rows N18/N27/N28/N30, comms/outputs/2026-09-07-golden-nuggets/, the executor log on Nano, and the absence of any Pacific row in vault/leads/PEOPLE-STATUS.md. Telegram inbound is still dead fleet-wide (see the 09-09 fleet map), so answer here in chat, not in Telegram.